A basic asm
statement has the following syntax:
asm [ volatile ] ( AssemblerInstructions )
The asm
keyword is a GNU extension.
When writing code that can be compiled with -ansi and the
various -std options, use __asm__
instead of
asm
(see Alternate Keywords).
volatile
volatile
qualifier has no effect.
All basic asm
blocks are implicitly volatile.
You may place multiple assembler instructions together in a single asm
string, separated by the characters normally used in assembly code for the
system. A combination that works in most places is a newline to break the
line, plus a tab character (written as ‘\n\t’).
Some assemblers allow semicolons as a line separator. However,
note that some assembler dialects use semicolons to start a comment.
Using extended asm
typically produces smaller, safer, and more
efficient code, and in most cases it is a better solution than basic
asm
. However, there are two situations where only basic asm
can be used:
asm
statements have to be inside a C
function, so to write inline assembly language at file scope (“top-level”),
outside of C functions, you must use basic asm
.
You can use this technique to emit assembler directives,
define assembly language macros that can be invoked elsewhere in the file,
or write entire functions in assembly language.
naked
attribute also require basic asm
(see Function Attributes).
Safely accessing C data and calling functions from basic asm
is more
complex than it may appear. To access C data, it is better to use extended
asm
.
Do not expect a sequence of asm
statements to remain perfectly
consecutive after compilation. If certain instructions need to remain
consecutive in the output, put them in a single multi-instruction asm
statement. Note that GCC's optimizers can move asm
statements
relative to other code, including across jumps.
asm
statements may not perform jumps into other asm
statements.
GCC does not know about these jumps, and therefore cannot take
account of them when deciding how to optimize. Jumps from asm
to C
labels are only supported in extended asm
.
Under certain circumstances, GCC may duplicate (or remove duplicates of) your assembly code when optimizing. This can lead to unexpected duplicate symbol errors during compilation if your assembly code defines symbols or labels.
Since GCC does not parse the AssemblerInstructions, it has no visibility of any symbols it references. This may result in GCC discarding those symbols as unreferenced.
The compiler copies the assembler instructions in a basic asm
verbatim to the assembly language output file, without
processing dialects or any of the ‘%’ operators that are available with
extended asm
. This results in minor differences between basic
asm
strings and extended asm
templates. For example, to refer to
registers you might use ‘%eax’ in basic asm
and
‘%%eax’ in extended asm
.
On targets such as x86 that support multiple assembler dialects,
all basic asm
blocks use the assembler dialect specified by the
-masm command-line option (see x86 Options).
Basic asm
provides no
mechanism to provide different assembler strings for different dialects.
Here is an example of basic asm
for i386:
/* Note that this code will not compile with -masm=intel */ #define DebugBreak() asm("int $3")